Facts: For the convenience of the parties the trial was held in the air conditioned chamber of the respondent judge Garcia. The complaint was under the premise that such act is in violation of the right to hold a public trial.
Issue: Whether or not such proceeding of holding trial in the chamber of the judge in violation to the principle of right to a public trial.
Held: It is not in violation of the right to a public trial since the trial was still open to public and there is no showing that the public was deprived to witness the trial proceeding.
Issue: Whether or not such proceeding of holding trial in the chamber of the judge in violation to the principle of right to a public trial.
Held: It is not in violation of the right to a public trial since the trial was still open to public and there is no showing that the public was deprived to witness the trial proceeding.
RSS Feed